Finstad-Costa Letter
We disagree with your agencies’ interpretation that the National Nutrition Monitoring Act of 1990 allows you to extract the alcohol guidance from the purview of the DGAC and house the periodic reviews in perpetuity to a committee within the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is required under the STOP Act to exclusively focus on prevention of underage drinking.”
“We also believe there is a need to examine the decision to launch a scientific project within SAMHSA that threatens to change the single source of truth on moderate alcohol consumption by adults from the DGAs to an annual report meant to advise Congress about progress in the states to prevent underage drinking.”
McGarvey-Barr Letter
It is critical that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) provide transparent, independent, and science-based advice and recommendations to the American public…”
“Is an interagency coordinating committee [ICCPUD] tasked with stopping underage drinking an appropriate venue to conduct a comprehensive review of legal adult alcohol consumption?”
“In August 2023, you suggested to the Daily Mail that the United States could adopt a recommendation made by the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA) that adults consume no more than two servings of alcohol per week. As you know, the Canadian federal government ultimately did not adopt that recommendation, and the White House debunked your claim as “absolutely false” in a tweet.”
“Do you have any reason to believe Drs. Naimi and Shield will not reach the same conclusions [recommendation that adults consume no more than two servings of alcohol per week] they made in their failed attempt to rewrite the Canadian moderate drinking guidelines?”
Industry Letter, June 2024
Americans deserve guidance based on sound science, not ideology, that is developed and communicated in a clear, meaningful way, to ensure Americans understand and implement it.”
“...we want to ensure that the next iteration of the U.S. DGAs is developed in a manner that is transparent, fair, and free from bias, and solely based on the preponderance of scientific and medical knowledge, as required by the law.”
Industry Letter, September 2020
America’s alcohol industry is a critical partner to our nation’s farmers, supporting more than 38,000 agricultural jobs which pour almost $5 billion into our nation’s economy.”
“We support sound science‐based nutrition policy for Americans and believe the DGAC Scientific Report’s suggested change to the consumption guidance for men is misleading and confusing to consumers, and ultimately harmful to American agricultural producers.”
“The alcohol industry generates hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity each year and supports American farmers and agricultural producers. Barley, corn, wheat, rice, grape, grain and hop farmers rely on America’s alcohol producers, and industries like dairy farmers depend on our nutritious spent grains for livestock feed.”
Letters From Congress
Letters From The Industry
New U.S. Alcohol Report Tainted by Bias, Conflicts
Broad Group of National Agriculture, Beverage and Hospitality Associations Urges Secretaries of USDA and HHS to Reject Findings
Washington, D.C. (January 14, 2025)
A broad coalition of the nation’s agriculture, beverage and hospitality industries issued the following statement today in response to the new Alcohol Intake and Health report from the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking (ICCPUD):
Today’s report is the product of a flawed, opaque and unprecedented process, rife with bias and conflicts of interest. Several members of the six-member ICCPUD panel have affiliations with international anti-alcohol advocacy groups, and the panel has worked closely with others connected with these advocates. Congress never authorized or appropriated money for the panel or its work, and numerous letters from Congress and industry have voiced serious concerns over the process."
Our collective organizations are a broad-based group representing seed to store, horticulture to hospitality. We are committed to science over bias. This report heightens our concerns that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans’ recommendations with respect to alcohol will not be based on a preponderance of sound scientific evidence."
We urge the Secretaries of Agriculture and Health & Human Services to uphold the integrity of the DGAs to promote informed and responsible decision-making around alcohol. The agencies should disregard the ICCPUD report in their final assessments for the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines.”
Members of Congress and stakeholders across agriculture, beverage and hospitality have repeatedly raised numerous concerns about the ICCPUD review panel, including:
-
Lack of transparency and limited opportunities for stakeholder input;
-
Issues with statutory authority, especially assigning research on adult alcohol consumption to a committee created solely to address underage drinking;
-
Clear evidence of bias and conflicts of interest in those tasked with conducting the research, including ties to international temperance organizations and anti-alcohol advocacy efforts;
-
An unprecedented process that allows for original research based on cherry-picked data and flawed methodologies.
Industry Letter, June 2024
While HHS and USDA have confirmed that alcohol recommendations will be included in the 2025-2030 DGAs, it is unclear what this multi-layered process for developing those recommendations will entail.
Nothing was known about the SAMHSA work until late January 2024, when a representative of SAMHSA provided a high-level overview of the ICCPUD study during a NASEM committee meeting.
Unlike the NASEM Panel and DGAC, no information was provided regarding the selection of the Scientific Review Panel and appointment of these individuals, nor was there a public nomination or comment period.
We urge HHS and USDA to ensure an alcohol review process that includes stakeholder input and public comment opportunities and that is transparent, deliberative, science-driven, and results in guidance grounded in the preponderance of scientific and medical knowledge as required by law.
Industry Letter, September 2020
America’s alcohol industry is a critical partner to our nation’s farmers, supporting more than 38,000 agricultural jobs which pour almost $5 billion into our nation’s economy.”
“We support sound science‐based nutrition policy for Americans and believe the DGAC Scientific Report’s suggested change to the consumption guidance for men is misleading and confusing to consumers, and ultimately harmful to American agricultural producers.”
“The alcohol industry generates hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity each year and supports American farmers and agricultural producers. Barley, corn, wheat, rice, grape, grain and hop farmers rely on America’s alcohol producers, and industries like dairy farmers depend on our nutritious spent grains for livestock feed.”
Letters From The Industry
This statement is co-signed by the following national trade associations:
-
American Beverage Licensees
-
American Cider Association
-
Associated Cooperage Industries of America Inc.
-
American Craft Spirits Association
-
American Distilling Institute
-
American Distilled Spirits Alliance
-
Beer Institute
-
Brewers Association
-
Can Manufacturers Institute
-
Consumer Brands Association
-
Distilled Spirits Council of the United States
-
Glass Packaging Institute
-
Hop Growers of America
-
Independent Restaurant Coalition
-
National Association of Wheat Growers
-
National Barley Growers Association
-
National Beer Wholesalers Association
-
National Restaurant Association
-
United States Bartenders’ Guild
-
Wine America
-
Wine Institute
-
Wine & Spirits Guild of America
-
Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America
These trade associations have joined more than 85 organizations who have called for Science Over Bias in the Dietary Guidelines review process with respect to alcohol.